<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Problem 545: Luis Gomez - Twomover</title>
		<description>Discuss Problem 545: Luis Gomez - Twomover</description>
		<link>https://www.kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals-2015/786-luis-gomez-twomover.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 16:06:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="https://www.kobulchess.com/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/786/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Luis Gomez says:</title>
			<link>https://www.kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals-2015/786-luis-gomez-twomover.html#comment-6460</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The version of mr Permyakov significantly enriches the original form. The refutations are very good and respects the barnes issue with pseudo effect legrand. Bravo.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Luis Gomez</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals-2015/786-luis-gomez-twomover.html#comment-6460</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Seetharaman Kalyan says:</title>
			<link>https://www.kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals-2015/786-luis-gomez-twomover.html#comment-6393</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Thanks for the good analysis Kjell Widlert! The bad refutation of the original, made this paradox invisible! The improved version makes everything clear!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Seetharaman Kalyan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 12:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals-2015/786-luis-gomez-twomover.html#comment-6393</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Kjell Widlert says:</title>
			<link>https://www.kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals-2015/786-luis-gomez-twomover.html#comment-6391</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The version seems to me a great improvement. The paradox of the Barnes theme ("why does the refutation of the double threat not refute the same threats when they are single?") is handled in a unified manner - 1.Sc3? closes c5-c1 so Oxc5 does not defend against Be4#, and 1.Se3! closes c5-f2 so Qxc5 does not defend against Rf2#.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Kjell Widlert</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2015 20:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals-2015/786-luis-gomez-twomover.html#comment-6391</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Seetharaman Kalyan says:</title>
			<link>https://www.kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals-2015/786-luis-gomez-twomover.html#comment-6389</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Evgeny Permyakov sends a beautiful version of 545, removing its only defect the bad refutation. I appreciate his technique and skill of composing! Very instructive even for experienced composers! version by Evgeny Permyakov http://i.imgur.com/LCXTF58.png]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Seetharaman Kalyan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2015 06:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals-2015/786-luis-gomez-twomover.html#comment-6389</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Seetharaman Kalyan says:</title>
			<link>https://www.kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals-2015/786-luis-gomez-twomover.html#comment-6387</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Here is another example of the Barnes theme. Marjan nicely combines it with an excellent key, white correction and changed mate! http://i.imgur.com/sKEhabf.png You can see the The preliminary award of the FIDE World Cup 2015 here! http://www.wfcc.ch/wp-content/uploads/FIDE-World-Cup-2015-section-a-twomovers.pdf]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Seetharaman Kalyan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2015 12:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals-2015/786-luis-gomez-twomover.html#comment-6387</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Seetharaman Kalyan says:</title>
			<link>https://www.kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals-2015/786-luis-gomez-twomover.html#comment-6382</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This theme is a good paradox. Not frequently seen. The capture refutations are a weakness, but we could not any improvement without losing the Le-grand effect.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Seetharaman Kalyan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals-2015/786-luis-gomez-twomover.html#comment-6382</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
